![CREDIT: Tow of Coventry] Expanding solicitor invoices access doesn't make them more open to public access, a laywer points out.](https://e8dgfhu6pow.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Coventry-Town_hall.jpg?strip=all&lossy=1&ssl=1)
![CREDIT: Tow of Coventry] Expanding solicitor invoices access doesn't make them more open to public access, a laywer points out.](https://e8dgfhu6pow.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Coventry-Town_hall-336x223.jpg?strip=all&lossy=1&ssl=1)
COVENTRY, RI — Dist. 1 Councilman Jonathan Pascua’s laws increasing redacted solicitor invoices entry to all Council members nonetheless leaves the confidential data protected as an exemption to the state’s Entry to Public Document Act (APRA), however raises further issues.
Pascua addressed voters in a video posted to his Facebook page at 9 p.m. April 16, explaining increasing redacted solicitor invoices entry was a part of a package deal that might be mentioned in the course of the April 22 City Council assembly, and giving the City Supervisor and Finance Director full entry to the paperwork. Extra objects he proposes embrace requiring an merchandise on the Council agenda within the occasion any division traits towards exceeding its funds by 5 p.c, all authorized invoicing should undergo the City Supervisor and Finance Director, and funds actuals might be required repeatedly. All of his proposals, he mentioned might be recorded within the assembly minutues, so voters can see the selections being made.
“The laws goals to convey the next stage of accountability and transparency to our city authorities,” Pascua mentioned, “This decision is about greater than the solicitor’s funds. It’s about making certain accountability throughout all departments.”
Increasing Solicitor Invoices Entry Doesn’t Have an effect on Public Data Entry
Throughout public remark on the April 8 Coventry City Council assembly, audio system debated the professionals and cons of permitting public and elected officers entry to unaltered solicitor invoices, with some suggesting that enlargement would open the paperwork to public disclosure. Warwick Metropolis Councilman Jeremy Rix, a lawyer and somebody with expertise in coping with such paperwork, mentioned he expects that data that might compromise city authorized negotiations, doubtless already protected from public disclosure under APRA exemptions, will not be any extra weak to a public data request if multiple public official has entry to it.
“If it’s not a public file, it’s not a public file,” Rix mentioned.
Rix additionally mentioned not revealing particulars other than line merchandise prices of the solicitor’s work on energetic circumstances is a great, and bonafide case of maintaining opposing legal professionals from studying sufficient a couple of municipality’s technique to compromise the city or metropolis’s case.
“You don’t go and reveal who your witnesses are to the opposite facet,” Rix mentioned, till you’re prepared for them to testify in court docket. However, he mentioned, data like that may be revealed after the case has occurred.
So, though the variety of public officers with entry to the redacted invoices doesn’t make the data extra accessible to the general public legally, limiting the individuals who can share that data, unintentionally or in any other case, is usually smart. Through the March 25 assembly on the subject, Council President Hilary Lima remarked she didn’t belief (now former) Dist. 3 Councilman James LeBlanc and Dist. 5 Councilman Scott Copley to not share the data.
“I feel that almost all (of the Coventry City Council) even have a reasonably good level there,” Rix mentioned.